Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Mary SENECAL, Petitioner, v. H. Carl McCALL, as New York State Comptroller, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's application for ordinary and accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner was employed as a mental hygiene therapy aide at a psychiatric hospital where she cared for geriatric patients. She was injured when she slipped on a wet floor, fracturing her right hip. Petitioner's subsequent applications for both accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits were denied on the ground that she had failed to prove that she was permanently incapacitated from performing her previous employment-related duties. Substantial evidence supports this determination. The orthopedic surgeon who testified as an expert witness on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System stated that his physical examination of petitioner, together with his review of various diagnostic test results, led him to conclude that she did not sustain a permanently disabling injury and that any continuing degenerative changes could be attributed to petitioner's age, obesity and diabetes. While petitioner presented countervailing evidence, including the testimony of her chiropractor, it lies within respondent's authority to evaluate conflicting medical evidence and to accept the opinion of one expert medical witness over that of another (see, Matter of Sloan v. McCall, 238 A.D.2d 666, 656 N.Y.S.2d 974; Matter of Cole v. McCall, 231 A.D.2d 775, 646 N.Y.S.2d 911).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
YESAWICH, Justice.
CARDONA, P.J., and CREW, SPAIN and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)