Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Juan ALVARADO, Petitioner, v. Glenn GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from exchanging contraband that may be classified as a weapon. The finding was based, in part, upon a misbehavior report which stated that petitioner was standing in the facility yard when he was observed removing a razor wrapped in plastic from his right pants pocket and handing it to another inmate. Initially, we reject petitioner's contention that the determination must be annulled because the time of the incident listed in the misbehavior report was inconsistent with the time set forth in the unusual incident report. Given that the misbehavior report contained adequate detail to provide petitioner with notice of the charge against him, we conclude that the minor time discrepancy was a harmless technical defect (see, Matter of Mays v. Goord, 243 A.D.2d 882, 663 N.Y.S.2d 322). Finally, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who witnessed the exchange provides substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Rodriguez v. Goord, 250 A.D.2d 904, 672 N.Y.S.2d 518). To the extent that petitioner's evidence conflicted with the misbehavior report and the correction officer's testimony, this raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Carini v. Mann, 237 A.D.2d 761, 654 N.Y.S.2d 484). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)