Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John WISLOH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AIR-A-PLANE CORPORATION, Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant; Ogden Services Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated November 8, 1996, which granted the third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment (1) dismissing the third-party complaint, and (2) on its counterclaim for the costs, expenses, and attorney's fees of the litigation.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff John Wisloh was injured when he was struck on the head by a door, which he had opened, to the panel of an aircraft heating unit that he was in the process of operating. The aircraft heating unit was designed, manufactured, and distributed by the appellant. At the time of the injury, the plaintiff was employed by the third-party defendant, Ogden Services Corporation (hereinafter Ogden).
While the appellant argues that there are questions of fact as to whether Ogden provided training and instruction to Wisloh, his injuries resulted from his opening a door-a common activity for which an employer has no duty to train an employee (see, Dupper v. Conrail, 120 A.D.2d 638, 640-641, 501 N.Y.S.2d 910; see also, Tjepkema v. Rochdale Meat Mkt., 238 A.D.2d 333, 656 N.Y.S.2d 303). Moreover, in a companion appeal, we have dismissed the plaintiffs' claim against the appellant (see, Wisloh v. Air-A-Plane Corp., 251 A.D.2d 658, 676 N.Y.S.2d 484 [decided herewith] ). The appellant's remaining contention is without merit. Accordingly, Ogden is entitled to summary judgment.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 29, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)