Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Fa'SHON S. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services of New York, Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, petitioner-respondent; William R. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated February 9, 2006, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, upon his default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, and upon denying his motion to vacate his default, inter alia, terminated his parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the Heart Share Human Services of New York, Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The father's incarceration at the time of the fact-finding hearing was not a reasonable excuse for his default because he provided no explanation as to why he did not notify his attorney or the court of his imprisonment (see Matter of Tiffany L., 294 A.D.2d 365, 366, 746 N.Y.S.2d 389; Matter of Raymond Anthony A., 192 A.D.2d 529, 530, 596 N.Y.S.2d 723). Since the father established neither a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear nor a meritorious defense to the proceeding, the Family Court properly denied the father's motion to vacate his default (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Michael William O., 16 A.D.3d 511, 791 N.Y.S.2d 612).
The father's remaining contention is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)