Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert F. CODRINGTON II, respondent, v. Nazier AHMAD, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated July 26, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
The defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345, 746 N.Y.S.2d 865, 774 N.E.2d 1197; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
The plaintiff's examining physician improperly relied on unsworn and unaffirmed reports of other physicians (see Elder v. Stokes, 35 A.D.3d 799, 828 N.Y.S.2d 138; Felix v. New York City Tr. Auth., 32 A.D.3d 527, 528, 819 N.Y.S.2d 835; Friedman v. U-Haul Truck Rental, 216 A.D.2d 266, 267, 627 N.Y.S.2d 765). Therefore, the physician's report was without probative value in opposing the defendants' motion. The plaintiff's affidavit was insufficient to show that he sustained a serious injury caused by the accident since there was no objective medical evidence to demonstrate that he sustained a serious injury (see Yakubov v. CG Trans Corp., 30 A.D.3d 509, 510, 817 N.Y.S.2d 353; Davis v. New York City Tr. Auth., 294 A.D.2d 531, 531-532, 742 N.Y.S.2d 658). The plaintiff's remaining submissions were without probative value in opposing the motion since they were unsworn, unaffirmed, or uncertified (see Grasso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813, 814-815, 580 N.Y.S.2d 178, 588 N.E.2d 76; Felix v. New York City Tr. Auth., supra at 528, 819 N.Y.S.2d 835; Yakubov v. CG Trans Corp., supra; Pagano v. Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268, 270, 587 N.Y.S.2d 692; see also CPLR 4518 [c] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)