PEOPLE v. BENNETTE (2005)

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blackburne, J.), rendered February 25, 2002, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

 The defendant contends that the jury verdict finding him guilty of assault in the second degree and not guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree was repugnant.   This contention is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant's counsel failed to raise the issue before the discharge of the jury (see People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745, 452 N.Y.S.2d 12, 437 N.E.2d 271).   In any event, viewing the elements of the crime as charged to the jury (see People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, 4, 447 N.Y.S.2d 132, 431 N.E.2d 617), the jury could have found that the defendant initially possessed a dangerous instrument without any intent to use it unlawfully (see People v. Salazar, 16 A.D.3d 439, 792 N.Y.S.2d 98;  People v. Holloway, 253 A.D.2d 767, 768, 677 N.Y.S.2d 489;  People v. Smith, 235 A.D.2d 558, 559, 653 N.Y.S.2d 931).   Thus, the verdict was not repugnant (see People v. Salazar, supra ).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.