Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Alice J. STEWART, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
In 1994, claimant and her family, including her parents, moved from North Carolina to New York. After claimant's father passed away in 1996, claimant's mother became depressed and experienced some health problems which included a heart condition, high blood pressure and diabetes. Although claimant's mother needed help remembering to take her medication, she still drove a car and did not require around-the-clock personal care. In 1999, claimant resigned from her employment for the purpose of moving back to North Carolina to help out with her mother, who wished to be closer to family members in that State.
Based on the record before us, we find that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant's decision to leave her employment, while understandable, was nevertheless for personal and noncompelling reasons (see, Matter of Santana [Commissioner of Labor], 261 A.D.2d 687, 689 N.Y.S.2d 726; Matter of Scarlino [Sweeney], 243 A.D.2d 800, 662 N.Y.S.2d 850). Given, inter alia, the presence of other family members in North Carolina, the fact that claimant's mother did not require constant care and claimant's statement that she was available for full-time employment, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision despite the numerous family pressures described in claimant's brief.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: August 03, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)