Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Barbara A. GERACITANO, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
Claimant was a seasonal employee of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and would apply for unemployment insurance benefits during her off season. Throughout the year, however, claimant was also an elected councilperson and received a salary including health benefits and the opportunity to participate in the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement system. As a councilperson, claimant was required to follow up with constituents and perform various other duties. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board held that claimant performed services as an elected official more often than she reported and, therefore, was not totally unemployed.
In our view, substantial evidence supports the Board's ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed (see, Matter of Silverstein [Sweeney], 236 A.D.2d 757, 654 N.Y.S.2d 203; Matter of Belle [Sweeney], 225 A.D.2d 826, 638 N.Y.S.2d 530, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 805, 646 N.Y.S.2d 985, 670 N.E.2d 226). This Court has previously held that a councilperson was not totally unemployed where the proof showed that he received an annual salary for his work as a councilperson, performed a variety of duties in that capacity and was subject to inquiries by his constituents (see, Matter of Silverstein [Sweeney], supra, at 757, 654 N.Y.S.2d 203). Accordingly, claimant was properly denied unemployment insurance benefits.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 02, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)