Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Perry WHITE, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 7, 1999, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a housekeeping person until he was discharged for fighting with a co-worker. Claimant had previously complained to the employer about the co-worker's harassment and when he approached his supervisor to voice another complaint, the co-worker confronted claimant in what the supervisor described as a provoking manner. According to the supervisor, claimant responded by punching the co-worker in the face and a scuffle ensued. Claimant testified that he did not punch the co-worker and merely pushed him away in response to the co-worker's attack. Inasmuch as fighting with a co-worker, regardless of who initiated it, may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Williams [National School Bus Serv.-Commissioner of Labor ], 257 A.D.2d 839, 685 N.Y.S.2d 812), there is substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's finding of misconduct. Claimant's denial that he punched the co-worker and assertion of self-defense created questions of credibility which the Board was entitled to resolve against him (see, Matter of Love [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 674, 670 N.Y.S.2d 984). We have considered claimant's arguments and find them lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)