Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Lorraine LIVINGSTON, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 25, 1998, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.
Claimant, who had worked as an on-call nurse's aide, filed an initial claim for unemployment insurance benefits effective February 2, 1998. Thereafter, on February 13, 1998, claimant was offered a temporary one-day assignment the following day as a nurse's aide which she refused because of a scheduled job interview for full-time employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.
We affirm. Given the proof in the record and the permissible inferences that can be drawn therefrom, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause (see, e.g., Matter of Zimmerman [Commissioner of Labor], 252 A.D.2d 648, 675 N.Y.S.2d 209, appeal dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 1025, 684 N.Y.S.2d 487, 707 N.E.2d 442; Matter of Cancellieri [Sweeney], 231 A.D.2d 769, 646 N.Y.S.2d 736). Claimant's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)