Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Ann M. GATTO, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 30, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
The record indicates that, during the last 1 1/212 years of claimant's employment as a receptionist and purchasing manager, she had to commute 70 miles each way from her home to work and back again, sometimes in heavy traffic. Claimant resigned her position because the long commute made her feel drowsy and she was afraid of falling asleep at the wheel. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she left her employment for noncompelling reasons. The Board rationally concluded that claimant had accepted the longstanding commute as part of the terms and conditions of her employment (see, Matter of Cinque [Sweeney], 224 A.D.2d 912, 638 N.Y.S.2d 794). Notably, claimant provided no evidence indicating that a medical condition was causing her drowsiness while commuting, nor did she receive any medical advice to quit her job (see, Matter of Ikoli [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 673, 671 N.Y.S.2d 206; Matter of Colavito [Hartnett], 180 A.D.2d 883, 579 N.Y.S.2d 488). We have considered claimant's remaining arguments and find them to be unpersuasive.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 27, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)