Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Kathryn M. BERRY, Respondent. E.J. Noble Hospital/Samaritan Medical Center, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent. (And Another Related Claim.)
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 19, 1998, which ruled that claimants were entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Claimants, both licensed practical nurses, were discharged by the employer, a hospital, for verbally abusing three elderly female patients. It was alleged that claimants yelled at the patients, woke them up to take them to the bathroom and then “herded” them like cattle. Claimants' applications for unemployment insurance benefits were denied and, at the ensuing hearing, the employer produced witnesses who either were not present during the alleged incidents or, in fact, corroborated the testimony of claimants who denied any rude or abusive behavior on their part.
We find that substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that claimants did not lose their employment under disqualifying circumstances and were entitled to unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of McDuffie [Menorah Home & Hosp. for the Aged & Infirm-Commissioner of Labor ], 257 A.D.2d 824, 684 N.Y.S.2d 12). We decline to substitute our judgment for that of the Board, even when the Board's resolution of credibility issues differs from that reached by the Administrative Law Judge (see, Matter of Higgins [Marketsoft Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 257 A.D.2d 881, 684 N.Y.S.2d 75; Matter of Phillips [Commissioner of Labor], 257 A.D.2d 867, 684 N.Y.S.2d 68).
ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)