Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Sharon M. ESPOSITO, Respondent. National Write Your Congressman Inc., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 9, 1998, which ruled that National Write Your Congressman Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.
Claimant worked as a sales representative selling subscriptions for membership in National Write Your Congressman Inc., a legislative research organization. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that National exercised sufficient direction and control over claimant's work to establish the existence of an employment relationship (see, Matter of Wassey [Kenmark Opt. Co.-Commissioner of Labor], 255 A.D.2d 650, 680 N.Y.S.2d 272). Various indicia of employment were shown to exist by virtue of evidence that claimant had an assigned territory and was provided with a half-day training course. National set the membership price and claimant's commission percentage. Claimant was obligated to advise her regional manager of the days she would not be able to solicit business, and any customer complaints were handled by National. Claimant was required to send in weekly sales reports and failure to do so could result in the forfeiture of commissions. We conclude that although evidence was submitted that might also justify a different conclusion, such as the existence of an independent contractor agreement, the record contains substantial evidence in support of the Board's finding that claimant worked in an employment relationship; accordingly, its decision will not be disturbed (see, id.; see also, Matter of Voss [Crown Mktg. Group-Commissioner of Labor], --- A.D.2d ----, 689 N.Y.S.2d 733). Finally, the Board correctly concluded that it was not bound by a ruling of the Internal Revenue Service involving employer-employee relationships (see, Matter of American Home Improvement Prods. [Commissioner of Labor], 261 A.D.2d 760, 689 N.Y.S.2d 759).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)