Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Jacqueline GRANEK, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 28, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
When this matter was previously before this court, we dismissed claimant's appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that she was disqualified from receiving benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct (679 N.Y.S.2d 446). Thereafter, claimant moved for reargument and we granted the motion, vacating our prior decision and order.
Upon considering the merits of the appeal, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant committed disqualifying misconduct by falsifying her time records. Claimant admitted that she arrived late to work on four occasions without deducting the hours from her time sheet in violation of the employer's known policy requiring accurate time records. An employee's falsification of time records (see, Matter of Hendrickson [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 909, 672 N.Y.S.2d 530) and failure to abide by established workplace policies (see, Matter of Garcia [Commissioner of Labor], 256 A.D.2d 786, 681 N.Y.S.2d 631) may constitute disqualifying misconduct. Claimant's exculpatory explanation for the time discrepancies merely created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Hawkins [Commissioner of Labor], 254 A.D.2d 558, 678 N.Y.S.2d 703; Matter of Elewa [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 618, 670 N.Y.S.2d 945).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)