Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Michelle KWIATKOWSKA, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 24, 1998, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant, a waitress at a coffee shop, was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment in her base period to file a valid original claim and was therefore charged with a recoverable overpayment of benefits. It is within the province of the Board to resolve issues of credibility and evaluate evidence presented (see, Matter of Pranzo [Sweeney], 235 A.D.2d 897, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1022). While claimant alleged that she worked sufficient weeks to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits, she was unable to specify the amount of time she worked during the base period or the amount of money earned. Inasmuch as the record provides substantial evidence to support the finding that there was insufficient proof presented at the hearing to establish claimant's eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits, the decision must be upheld (see, id.; Matter of Sherman [Hartnett], 174 A.D.2d 944, 571 N.Y.S.2d 837, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 862, 576 N.Y.S.2d 220, 582 N.E.2d 603).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)