Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Joseph A. BASILE Jr., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 31, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling, inter alia, that claimant was not totally unemployed during the periods that he was receiving unemployment insurance benefits and charging him with a recoverable overpayment based upon a finding that claimant was an officer and 50% shareholder in a food service management company which provided cafeteria service to private schools. The record discloses that claimant was represented on the corporate tax returns as an officer and shareholder of the corporation, and that similar information was also reported to the State Insurance Fund. Furthermore, claimant's Federal tax return indicates that claimant shared in the corporation's net profit. Claimant's contention that the documentary evidence is false presented a credibility issue which the Board was free to resolve against claimant (see, Matter of Baumbach [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 918, 672 N.Y.S.2d 508). Given this documentary evidence and the fact that claimant failed to disclose such information, we find no reason to disturb the Board's finding that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits and that he made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Tenore [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 749, 664 N.Y.S.2d 667).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)