Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Duane J. GUTHRIE, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 17, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
In addition to his full-time job, claimant had a part-time position as a weekend night auditor at a hotel. Claimant notified the hotel that he was resigning for personal reasons but agreed to continue working until a replacement was hired. When a replacement was found on May 28, 1997, claimant was advised that his last day of employment would be June 8, 1997. Although claimant was terminated from his full-time job on May 29, 1997 for violating company policy, he declined the ensuing offer to continue his part-time employment at the hotel beyond June 8, 1997. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. We affirm. A claimant who voluntarily leaves his or her “last employment” without good cause is disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (Labor Law § 593[1]; see generally, Matter of Gruber [New York City Dept. of Personnel-Sweeney], 89 N.Y.2d 225, 652 N.Y.S.2d 589, 674 N.E.2d 1354). Here, claimant's last employment was with the hotel, and the fact that he no longer wanted to work on weekends did not constitute good cause for leaving. Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 09, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)