Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Kathryn M. JOHNSTON, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 6, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding, inter alia, that claimant was not totally unemployed during part of the period she was collecting unemployment insurance benefits. Claimant became president and sole shareholder of a corporation during the relevant time period. Although claimant's activities on behalf of the corporation (which included writing checks and entering into a contract for sale) were minimal and unprofitable, this does not preclude a finding that claimant was not totally unemployed and that she stood to gain financially from the continued operation of the business (see, Matter of Brooke [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 910, 673 N.Y.S.2d 474; Matter of Bannin [Sweeney], 247 A.D.2d 736, 669 N.Y.S.2d 75). Furthermore, inasmuch as claimant failed to disclose her corporate activities when certifying for benefits, the Board's finding that claimant made willful false statements and its assessment of a recoverable overpayment are supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Murak [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 751, 664 N.Y.S.2d 661). Claimant's remaining contentions, including bias on the part of the Administrative Law Judge and the effective date of her disqualification, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)