Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Dana F. DAVIS, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 12, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, reduced claimant's weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate.
While employed as an aircraft mechanic supervisor for the Federal Government, claimant contributed 7% of his salary toward his pension fund, for a total contribution of approximately $37,000. The employer matched claimant's pension contributions. Following claimant's retirement, he received monthly pension payments based upon his salary, age and years of employment. Thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reduced claimant's weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate pursuant to Labor Law § 600(7) on the ground that claimant contributed less than 50% to his pension fund. Given the present actuarial value of claimant's pension of approximately $235,000 based upon claimant's life expectancy and occupation, claimant's $37,000 contribution amounted to approximately 16% of the value of his pension. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that the employer contributed more than half of the actuarial value of claimant's pension, thereby reducing claimant's benefit rate (see, Matter of Jackson v. Catherwood, 20 N.Y.2d 863, 864, 285 N.Y.S.2d 94, 231 N.E.2d 784; Matter of Lemke [Sweeney], 243 A.D.2d 976, 663 N.Y.S.2d 386; Matter of D'Angelo [Sweeney], 240 A.D.2d 800, 658 N.Y.S.2d 514). The remaining contentions advanced by claimant have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)