Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Robert W. DRURY, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 15, 1998, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was terminated from his employment as a funeral director after he refused to act as a pallbearer as requested by the employer's vice-president. At the ensuing hearing, the vice-president testified that claimant had assisted with pallbearing on several previous occasions and that, in this instance, the request for assistance was expressly approved by claimant's supervisor. According to the vice-president, claimant nevertheless refused to comply with the request because he believed that pallbearing was not part of his job description. In light of the fact that the failure to comply with an employer's reasonable request may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Moucatel [Hudacs], 205 A.D.2d 822, 613 N.Y.S.2d 60), we find that the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Although claimant testified that he agreed to act as a pallbearer but that the vice-president inexplicably became enraged and left the funeral home, this created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Williams [Sweeney], 240 A.D.2d 837, 659 N.Y.S.2d 812). We have considered claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)