Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Elsy GUIBERT, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 5, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from her employment as an AIDS program coordinator at a community health center for violating the employer's confidentiality policy by divulging information about a prospective client to a colleague who was not a co-worker. Although the name of the prospective client was not revealed, a third party who overheard the conversation was able to identify the client. Thereafter, the third party relayed the information to the client's sister, who considered taking action against the employer. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits upon the ground that her employment was terminated due to misconduct. Inasmuch as claimant acted contrary to the employer's known policy and such conduct was potentially detrimental to the employer's best interest, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision finding that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Gibson [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 906, 672 N.Y.S.2d 531; Matter of Block [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 870, 672 N.Y.S.2d 456). While the Board reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, it is well settled that the Board is free to resolve credibility issues differently from the Administrative Law Judge (see, Matter of Lugo [Milford Mgt.-Commissioner of Labor], 251 A.D.2d 742, 673 N.Y.S.2d 772). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 29, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)