Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Mary B. CARAPELLA, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 15, 1997, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant received temporary part-time work assignments from an employment agency until she decided to leave her job in order to attend a legal secretarial training course. Although claimant was initially approved for additional benefits for vocational training pursuant to Labor Law § 599, that approval was withdrawn once it was determined that claimant was disqualified from receiving regular benefits. Because voluntarily leaving employment for the purpose of attending school does not constitute good cause under the Labor Law (see, Matter of Talyansky [Sweeney], 234 A.D.2d 880, 651 N.Y.S.2d 948, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 802, 660 N.Y.S.2d 713, 683 N.E.2d 336; Matter of Sanchez [Sweeney], 231 A.D.2d 778, 646 N.Y.S.2d 906), we find that substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that claimant was disqualified from receiving regular benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the finding that claimant was not entitled to additional benefits under Labor Law § 599 (see, Matter of Kern [Sweeney], 216 A.D.2d 769, 628 N.Y.S.2d 841).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 05, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)