Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Dorothy A. YANK, Respondent. National Evaluation Systems Inc., Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 20, 1996, which assessed National Evaluation Systems Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.
National Evaluation Systems Inc. (hereinafter NES) is a nationwide organization which administers tests to evaluate the skills and qualifications of candidates for various positions and licenses. NES challenges a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which found that claimant, together with those similarly situated, were its employees rather than independent contractors. Claimant submitted her resume in response to a newspaper advertisement for qualified teachers to read and score essay examinations of prospective teachers seeking certification in this State. The record indicates that NES, inter alia, provided a training session in connection with the State's criteria for scoring the examinations, provided space at a hotel where the examinations were to be scored between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., and paid the readers an hourly wage determined by NES. Two readers evaluated each test. In the event there was a discrepancy between the scores assigned, the readers' evaluations were subject to review. Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Board finding the existence of an employer-employee relationship, notwithstanding the fact that the record could support a contrary conclusion (see, e.g., Matter of Faculty Tutoring Serv. [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 744, 664 N.Y.S.2d 674; Matter of Educaid [Hartnett], 176 A.D.2d 420, 574 N.Y.S.2d 408, lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 751, 579 N.Y.S.2d 651, 587 N.E.2d 289).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 26, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)