Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Rodney FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. Lucien J. LeCLAIRE Jr., as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with flooding his prison cell and refusing a direct order. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
Although petitioner contends that the charge of flooding his prison cell was unsubstantiated, we disagree. The misbehavior report, together with statements made by petitioner at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Barham v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 607, 608, 838 N.Y.S.2d 273 [2007] ). As for petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased, there is no indication that the determination was the result of any purported bias (see Matter of Martinez v. Goord, 48 A.D.3d 851, 850 N.Y.S.2d 708 [2008] ). Regarding petitioner's claim that the hearing was untimely because it was commenced on the eighth day following the incident (see 7 NYCRR 251-5.1[a] ), we note that the regulatory time limits are directory, not mandatory, and there has been no demonstration that petitioner suffered any prejudice as a result of the one-day delay (see Matter of Chaney v. Selsky, 35 A.D.3d 1109, 1110, 828 N.Y.S.2d 604 [2006] ). Petitioner's remaining claims, to the extent not specifically addressed herein, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 17, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)