Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Patricia MASTACCIOULA, et al., appellants, v. Barbara SCIARRA, respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated October 2, 2003, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Patricia Mastaccioula did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Patricia Mastaccioula (hereinafter the plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) through an affirmation of her examining physician, the plaintiff's deposition testimony, and the plaintiff's medical records (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345, 746 N.Y.S.2d 865, 774 N.E.2d 1197; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176; Hodges v. Jones, 238 A.D.2d 962, 661 N.Y.S.2d 159; Fragale v. Geiger, 288 A.D.2d 431, 733 N.Y.S.2d 901). The affirmation of the plaintiff's physician failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact. While the physician concluded that the plaintiff had a “moderate disability,” he failed to set forth the tests that he used to arrive at this conclusion, or to quantify the results of those tests (see Kauderer v. Penta, 261 A.D.2d 365, 689 N.Y.S.2d 190). In the absence of any objective medical evidence, the mere parroting of language designed to tailor the claim to meet statutory requirements is insufficient (see Giannakis v. Paschilidou, 212 A.D.2d 502, 622 N.Y.S.2d 112).
Moreover, the plaintiff failed to submit any competent medical evidence to show that she was unable to perform substantially all of her daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days following the subject accident (see Sainte-Aime v. Ho, 274 A.D.2d 569, 712 N.Y.S.2d 133; Jackson v. New York City Tr. Auth., 273 A.D.2d 200, 708 N.Y.S.2d 469).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 04, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)