Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Victor MORRA, appellant, v. Mergantine WHITE, respondent (and a third-party action).
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered June 3, 1999, as, upon granting the defendant's motion to reargue that branch of a prior motion which was for summary judgment dismissing his cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 241(6), vacated so much of a prior order of the same court dated October 8, 1998, as denied that branch of the motion and granted that branch of the motion.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff, Victor Morra, was allegedly injured when he slipped and fell on snow and ice at a construction site managed by the defendant, Mergantine White (hereinafter Mergantine). At the time of the accident the plaintiff was walking across an open lot to perform his duties taking water readings. As the plaintiff was not engaged in the construction project, he is not within the class of persons entitled to protection under Labor Law § 241(6) (see, Jock v. Fien, 80 N.Y.2d 965, 590 N.Y.S.2d 878, 605 N.E.2d 365; Shields v. St. Marks Hous. Assocs., 230 A.D.2d 903, 646 N.Y.S.2d 854; Koch v. E.C.H. Holding Corp., 248 A.D.2d 510, 512, 669 N.Y.S.2d 896).
Moreover, the Industrial Code regulations relied upon by the plaintiff, specifically, 12 NYCRR 23-1.33(d)(1); 23-1.7(d) and (e), are inapplicable to this case where the plaintiff slipped in an open area of the construction site, and not within a defined walkway or passageway (see, Constantino v. Kreisler Borg Florman General Construction Co., 272 A.D.2d 361, 707 N.Y.S.2d 487; Motyka v. Ogden Martin Systems of Onondaga Limited Partnership, 272 A.D.2d 980, 708 N.Y.S.2d 681; Bauer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 249 A.D.2d 948, 672 N.Y.S.2d 567).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 10, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)