Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Paul REMBERT, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered July 7, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal trespass in the second degree, and possession of burglar's tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15[5] ), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).
The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury on the defense of justification is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ). In any event, the trial court properly denied the defendant's request for a justification charge since no reasonable view of the evidence supported such a charge (see People v. Cox, 92 N.Y.2d 1002, 684 N.Y.S.2d 473, 707 N.E.2d 428).
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial. Any prejudice to the defendant that might have resulted from the testimony of the prosecution's witness was alleviated by the trial court's prompt curative instructions to the jury (see People v. Brescia, 41 A.D.3d 613, 836 N.Y.S.2d 432; People v. Smith, 23 A.D.3d 415, 804 N.Y.S.2d 774; People v. Boston, 296 A.D.2d 576, 577, 746 N.Y.S.2d 28).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Thompson, 60 N.Y.2d 513, 519, 470 N.Y.S.2d 551, 458 N.E.2d 1228; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)