Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Yolanda ROKER, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered June 8, 2006, convicting her of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
On July 25, 2005, the defendant and two accomplices formulated a plan to steal stereo equipment from the decedent's apartment, to which the defendant had access. That evening, the defendant, who was inside the apartment, unlocked the apartment door, as planned. Her accomplices, believing that the decedent was asleep in his bedroom, then entered the apartment. However, the decedent, who was awake, came out of his bedroom and began struggling with the defendant's accomplices. The decedent was asphyxiated and killed during that struggle.
At trial, the defendant, who testified on her own behalf, raised the affirmative defense to felony murder (see Penal Law § 125.25[3] ). The affirmative defense, about which the jury was instructed, requires a defendant to establish, inter alia, that he or she “[h]ad no reasonable ground to believe that any other participant [in the underlying crime] intended to engage in conduct likely to result in death or serious physical injury” (Penal Law § 125.25[3][d]; see also Penal Law § 25.00[2] ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the jury was justified in rejecting the affirmative defense, since, inter alia, her exculpatory statements changed over time, making them less credible (see People v. Gonzales, 48 A.D.3d 698, 852 N.Y.S.2d 333; People v. Ocasio, 12 A.D.3d 621, 622, 786 N.Y.S.2d 543; People v. Jackson, 208 A.D.2d 862, 863, 618 N.Y.S.2d 57). Furthermore, on cross-examination, she acknowledged that she was aware that her accomplices might harm the decedent during the robbery (see People v. Ocasio, 12 A.D.3d at 622, 786 N.Y.S.2d 543; cf. People v. Adams, 135 A.D.2d 914, 915, 522 N.Y.S.2d 312).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)