Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gregory M. GRIFFIN, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 18, 2007, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.
Defendant was indicted and charged with assault in the second degree. He subsequently pleaded guilty to such charge and, following sentencing, appealed from the judgment of conviction.
Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his plea was not knowing and voluntary due to the alleged insufficiency of the plea allocution. Inasmuch as defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, he has not preserved for our review the factual sufficiency of the plea (see People v. Ramirez, 45 A.D.3d 1108, 1108, 845 N.Y.S.2d 572 [2007]; People v. Sanabria, 43 A.D.3d 1228, 1229, 842 N.Y.S.2d 107 [2007] ). The exception to the preservation rule is inapplicable here since there is nothing in the plea colloquy that casts significant doubt on defendant's guilt or the voluntariness of his plea (see People v. Hall, 41 A.D.3d 1090, 1091, 839 N.Y.S.2d 565 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 876, 842 N.Y.S.2d 788, 874 N.E.2d 755 [2007]; People v. Rose, 41 A.D.3d 1033, 1034, 837 N.Y.S.2d 440 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 926, 844 N.Y.S.2d 180, 875 N.E.2d 899 [2007] ). On the contrary, defendant stated during such colloquy that, while an inmate at the Broome County Jail, he punched someone causing an injury to the man's lip requiring nine stitches, thereby sufficiently establishing the elements of the crime, including intent to cause physical injury (see People v. Gannon, 301 A.D.2d 873, 873, 754 N.Y.S.2d 107 [2003] ). Further, defendant was informed of the rights being given up by and the consequences of entering a guilty plea, and he affirmatively communicated to County Court that he had not been coerced into entering the plea and that he had sufficiently discussed the plea bargain with his attorney. Therefore, we have no reason to view defendant's plea as anything but knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v. Gutierrez, 45 A.D.3d 971, 972, 844 N.Y.S.2d 514 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
LAHTINEN, J.
CARDONA, P.J., PETERS, SPAIN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 31, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)