Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony STEWARD, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, violating facility visiting procedures and possessing drugs. The charges were filed after a female visitor came to the prison and voluntarily surrendered a balloon containing marihuana which she indicated petitioner had asked her to bring to the facility. He was found guilty of all charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Gee v. Goord, 21 A.D.3d 636, 637, 800 N.Y.S.2d 775 [2005]; Matter of Alvarez v. Goord, 17 A.D.3d 945, 946, 793 N.Y.S.2d 630 [2005] ). The visitor's testimony that petitioner was unaware of her marihuana possession, which was inconsistent with her prior statement, presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see e.g. Matter of Dover v. Goord, 287 A.D.2d 815, 816, 731 N.Y.S.2d 517 [2001] ). In addition, upon reviewing the hearing transcript, we do not find that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination at issue flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Quezada v. Goord, 19 A.D.3d 964, 965, 797 N.Y.S.2d 323 [2005]; Matter of Boyd v. Goord, 18 A.D.3d 1078, 1079, 795 N.Y.S.2d 415 [2005] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions are unpreserved for our review having not been raised at the disciplinary hearing (see Matter of Boyd v. Goord, supra at 1079, 795 N.Y.S.2d 415).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 22, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)