Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Edward HUMPHREY, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination which found him guilty of unauthorized exchange.1 We now confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence, hearing testimony and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Morgan v. Goord, 10 A.D.3d 792, 792, 781 N.Y.S.2d 812 [2004] ). Petitioner's innocent explanation created a credibility issue that was properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rizzuto v. Goord, 35 A.D.3d 1075, 1075, 825 N.Y.S.2d 592 [2006] ). Petitioner's remaining claims, to the extent preserved, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.2
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. At the conclusion of petitioner's tier III disciplinary hearing, he was also found guilty of urging others to participate in actions detrimental to the order of the facility, but that charge was dismissed on administrative appeal.
2. We need not address petitioner's contention regarding the propriety of the confidential information inasmuch as the charge herein is sustainable without reliance upon such information.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 26, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)