Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John Anthony DeOLIVEIRA, petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, etc., et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated March 31, 1998, which affirmed the determination of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner was guilty of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180(d) (as amended by L. 1997, ch. 422, § 72-75).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
This court's review of the determination of an administrative agency is limited to whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Liuzzo v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Bd., 209 A.D.2d 618, 619 N.Y.S.2d 654), and deference must be given to the fact-finding and credibility determinations of the agency (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193).
The testimony of the police officer who issued the summons regarding his visual estimation of the petitioner's speed as well as his extensive training in making such estimations, is a sufficient basis for the determination of the Administrative Law Judge (see, People v. Olsen, 22 N.Y.2d 230, 292 N.Y.S.2d 420, 239 N.E.2d 354; Matter of Neiman v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board, 265 A.D.2d 558, 697 N.Y.S.2d 310; Matter of Pernick v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 217 A.D.2d 630, 629 N.Y.S.2d 783). As the determination was supported by substantial evidence, we decline to disturb it.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 17, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)