Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lee HOFRICHTER, respondent, v. NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AT SYOSSET, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated February 26, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to decide the defendants' motion after the final resolution of a prompt application to the Workers' Compensation Board to determine the parties' rights under the Workers' Compensation Law.
The plaintiff, a hospital volunteer, tripped and fell in an employee parking lot when she went to her car during her lunch break. The plaintiff never filed a claim for Workers' Compensation Benefits, but rather commenced the instant action. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff was injured in the course of her employment and is relegated to Workers' Compensation benefits as her exclusive remedy. The Supreme Court disagreed and denied the motion. We reverse.
It is well settled that “primary jurisdiction with respect to determinations as to the applicability of the Workers' Compensation Law has been vested in the Workers' Compensation Board and that it is therefore inappropriate for the courts to express views with respect thereto pending determination by the board” (Botwinick v. Ogden, 59 N.Y.2d 909, 911, 466 N.Y.S.2d 291, 453 N.E.2d 520; O'Rourke v. Long, 41 N.Y.2d 219, 391 N.Y.S.2d 553, 359 N.E.2d 1347; Manetta v. Town of Hempstead Day Care Ctr., 248 A.D.2d 517, 669 N.Y.S.2d 901; Becker v. Clarkstown Cent. School Dist., 157 A.D.2d 641, 549 N.Y.S.2d 739).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have referred the case to the Workers' Compensation Board for a factual hearing upon which the Board can make a reasoned factual determination as to whether the plaintiff has a valid claim for damages or whether she is relegated to benefits under the Workers' Compensation Law (see, Manetta v. Town of Hempstead Day Care Ctr., supra; Becker v. Clarkstown Cent. School Dist., supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)