Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kevin HOANG, etc., et al., appellants, v. MAN CHONG WONG, respondent.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated June 22, 2007, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The failure of the defendant landlord to provide heat and hot water to the plaintiffs' apartment was not a proximate cause of the personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff. While the defendant's conduct gave rise to the plaintiff mother's attempt to provide a substitute supply of hot water so that the infant plaintiff could bathe, the intervening act of the mother and the son walking into each other while the mother sought to transport a pot of boiled water into the bathroom brought about the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff. Those injuries would not have resulted from the failure to supply hot water alone, and cannot be classified as injuries normally to have been expected to ensue from the defendant landlord's conduct (see Martinez v. Lazaroff, 48 N.Y.2d 819, 820, 424 N.Y.S.2d 126, 399 N.E.2d 1148; Barragan v. Mathai, 253 A.D.2d 508, 509, 677 N.Y.S.2d 157; Laureano v. Louzoun, 165 A.D.2d 866, 560 N.Y.S.2d 337; see also Wells v. Finnegan, 177 A.D.2d 893, 894, 576 N.Y.S.2d 653). In opposition to the defendant establishing his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of the law, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 18, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)