Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Tyrone GIBBS, Appellant, v. Brion TRAVIS, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered July 26, 1996 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner's request for parole.
Petitioner is an inmate at Woodbourne Correctional Facility in Sullivan County, serving a prison term of 9 to 18 years following his conviction in 1986 of the crime of robbery in the first degree. This crime was committed while petitioner was on parole from a sentence imposed for a prior weapons-related offense. In February 1995, respondent denied petitioner's application for parole and Supreme Court dismissed his subsequent application for CPLR article 78 review.
Decisions regarding release on parole are discretionary and will not be disturbed provided that they satisfy the statutory requirements (see, Executive Law § 259-i; see also, Matter of Walker v. New York State Div. of Parole, 203 A.D.2d 757, 610 N.Y.S.2d 397) and are not irrational (see, Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 77, 427 N.Y.S.2d 982, 405 N.E.2d 225). Our review of the record discloses that the requisite factors were considered in arriving at the determination under review. A special emphasis was placed on the heinous nature of petitioner's crime, i.e., pistol-whipping his victim prior to robbing him, as well as the fact that this crime took place while petitioner was on parole. Also noted was petitioner's history of criminal activity, including three prior convictions for crimes involving the use of a loaded handgun. In addition, positive aspects of petitioner's application were noted, including his successful adjustment to the correctional facility's environment and his participation in college courses. We conclude that the record fails to support petitioner's contention that respondent's determination should be annulled.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 03, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)