Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
APPOLLON WATERPROOFING & RESTORATION CORP., et al., Appellants, v. KODIAK INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Kodiak Insurance Company has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff Appollon Waterproofing & Restoration Corp. with regard to a personal injury action brought against it, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated March 28, 1996, as granted Kodiak Insurance Company's motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for lack of personal jurisdiction.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The underlying personal injury action arose from injuries allegedly sustained by an employee of the defendant Diamon Corp. (hereinafter Diamon) at a work site in Bronx County. At the time of the accident, Diamon, a subcontractor in the project, was covered by a commercial general liability policy issued by the defendant Kodiak Insurance Company (hereinafter Kodiak). Both Kodiak and Diamon are New Jersey corporations.
In its motion to dismiss, Kodiak established that it is not licensed to do business in New York and that it never knowingly insured New York corporations or businesses. The plaintiffs failed to produce evidence demonstrating that Kodiak transacted business in New York or contracted anywhere to provide goods or services in New York (see, CPLR 302[a][1] ). The Supreme Court properly granted Kodiak's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (see, Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472-473, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 2181-2183, 85 L.Ed.2d 528; Future Ways v. Odiorne, 697 F.Supp. 1339, 1341-1342; Roldan v. Dexter Folder Co., 178 A.D.2d 589, 577 N.Y.S.2d 483).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 31, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)