Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Aaron NELSON a/k/a David Bowen, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), imposed October 2, 1992, the sentence being two concurrent indeterminate terms of 15 years to life imprisonment as a persistent felony offender, upon his convictions of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, respectively, both sentences to run consecutively to an indeterminate sentence of fifteen years to life imprisonment imposed upon his conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict.
ORDERED that the sentence is reversed, on the law, the adjudication that the defendant is a persistent felony offender is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing of the defendant as a second felony offender.
Upon the defendant's first felony conviction he received a sentence of probation and six months imprisonment. After his release, and while serving his term of probation, he committed his second felony. Upon that felony he was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 18 months to 3 years imprisonment to run concurrently with an indeterminate term of 1 to 3 years imprisonment imposed upon the violation of probation. Since the second felony was committed before he received a sentence in excess of one year for the first felony (Penal Law § 70.10[1][b]; People v. Melero, 182 A.D.2d 839, 582 N.Y.S.2d 795), the two convictions only count as one predicate felony for purposes of the persistent felony offender law (see, Penal Law § 70.10 [1][c]; People v. Morse, 62 N.Y.2d 205, 476 N.Y.S.2d 505, 465 N.E.2d 12; People v. Sykes, 110 A.D.2d 918, 488 N.Y.S.2d 463). Therefore, as the People correctly concede, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing (see, People v. Sykes, supra).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, or need not be addressed in light of our determination.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 31, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)