Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Andre HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, an inmate at Eastern Correctional Facility in Ulster County, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances. The charges stem from the positive results of a random urinalysis test on petitioner which indicated the presence of both opiates and cannabinoids. Contrary to his contention, we find that the procedure used in executing the request for an urinalysis test was proper. Although a correction officer selected petitioner for testing, the request for the urinalysis test was authorized and signed by the appropriate authority before either the request was issued or the test was performed. Accordingly, we conclude that respondents reasonably complied with the requisite procedures when conducting the urinalysis test (see, Matter of Melette v. Berry, 181 A.D.2d 950, 951, 581 N.Y.S.2d 463, lv. dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 1022, 592 N.Y.S.2d 668, 607 N.E.2d 815).
We also reject petitioner's contention that the chain of custody of the urine sample was broken. While petitioner contends that the urine sample was left unattended, the correction officer who performed the urinalysis test testified that the urine sample never left his possession. This conflicting testimony merely created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Lewis v. Coughlin, 172 A.D.2d 889, 567 N.Y.S.2d 953).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 10, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)