Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jean BERNIER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered November 19, 1999 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, for failure to state a cause of action.
On June 11, 1991, petitioner was sentenced in Federal court to 35 years in prison. Petitioner was subsequently returned to State custody and upon conviction sentenced in Supreme Court, New York County, on January 16, 1992 to an aggregate term of 12 1/212 to 25 years, to run consecutively to the federal sentence. In this proceeding, petitioner challenges his subsequent return to Federal custody contending that Penal Law § 70.20(3) requires that he serve his consecutive New York sentence first. Respondent moved for dismissal for failure to state a cause of action and for failure to join necessary parties. Supreme Court dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.
We affirm on the alternate ground that the petition must be dismissed for failure to name and serve a necessary party. As a consequence we do not reach the merits of the sufficiency of the petition. By reason of the fact that the State conviction occurred in New York City, the New York City Commissioner of Corrections is assigned the duty to deliver petitioner to the proper institution upon conviction (see, CPL 430.30). Since the City Commissioner is the official required to act and who also maintains the records which would reflect which jurisdiction first arrested petitioner and whether there was a waiver of primary jurisdiction, this official is a necessary party and failure to join him results in dismissal (see, CPLR 3211[a][10]; see, e.g., Matter of Brooks v. Dalsheim, 103 A.D.2d 986, 479 N.Y.S.2d 817).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MUGGLIN, J.
CREW III, J.P., PETERS, CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)