Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Theodore C.F. WOODS Jr., Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered January 26, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the first degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the first degree in full satisfaction of a six-count indictment and various other unrelated charges, with the express understanding that he would be sentenced to a prison term of 3 to 9 years. On this appeal, defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in refusing to adjudicate him a youthful offender or, alternatively, that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. Although there is a question of whether defendant served as a lookout during the crime or was actually present in the apartment at the time of the burglary, it is undisputed that during the course of the burglary two of the victims were assaulted with handguns. Due to the violent and serious nature of the crime, we find that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status (see, People v. Chapman, 227 A.D.2d 665, 641 N.Y.S.2d 472, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 934, 647 N.Y.S.2d 168, 670 N.E.2d 452; People v. Ferrari, 202 A.D.2d 872, 610 N.Y.S.2d 881). Also, given defendant's past criminal history and the fact that defendant received the benefit of his plea bargain, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v. Davis, 232 A.D.2d 678, 648 N.Y.S.2d 478, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 921, 654 N.Y.S.2d 723, 677 N.E.2d 295).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 01, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)