Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Barbara GALANDAUER, etc., respondent, v. BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, etc., et al., defendants, Jerry Bloom, etc., appellant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the defendant Jerry Bloom appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered November 3, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $235,000.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
On December 6, 1993, the plaintiff's decedent, Imre Galandauer, sought treatment for pain on his right side from the appellant. After ordering blood tests, the appellant diagnosed that the decedent had hepatitis and prescribed rest. When the decedent's condition worsened, the defendant referred him to a gastroenterologist, who ordered that a sonogram be performed. The decedent died on January 20, 1994, following surgery which revealed widespread metastatic cancer and an enlarged liver.
Following trial, the jury found that the appellant's failure to order a sonogram hastened the decedent's death, and awarded damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, there was sufficient evidence from which a jury could rationally conclude that he was negligent and that his negligence was a proximate cause of the decedent's pain and suffering in the six-week period between the decedent's first visit to the appellant and the decedent's death (see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 410 N.Y.S.2d 282, 382 N.E.2d 1145; Flowers v. Southampton Hosp., 215 A.D.2d 723, 627 N.Y.S.2d 81). Moreover, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, Simmons v. East Nassau Med. Group, 260 A.D.2d 463, 688 N.Y.S.2d 209).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 17, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)