Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lawania FRANCIS, etc., et al., respondents, v. NASSAU HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, et al., appellants.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated September 14, 2004, as denied those branches of their motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the claims for future lost wages and pecuniary loss, and granted the plaintiffs' cross motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Amendment of the complaint in this medical malpractice action to include a cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death “will not significantly expand the scope of proof or the relevant legal considerations on the issue of liability. The amendment will, of course, introduce new aspects on the issue of damages, but [the defendants do] not suggest how the failure to bring this cause within two years after the decedent's death has prejudiced [them] in the assembly or introduction of evidence in support of [their] defense as to such additional elements of damage” (Caffaro v. Trayna, 35 N.Y.2d 245, 251, 360 N.Y.S.2d 847, 319 N.E.2d 174). Therefore, the original complaint gave notice of the transactions and occurrences on which the wrongful death cause of action in the amended complaint is based, and the cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death was timely interposed (see CPLR 203).
The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 24, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)