Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Hector DIAZ, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
When petitioner was found unresponsive in his cell, correction officials suspected that he had taken an overdose of drugs and transported him to the hospital. Petitioner's cell was searched and two latex balloons filled with 22 smaller packets containing a powdery substance were recovered. The substance later tested positive for heroin. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a controlled substance. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and, upon administrative appeal, the determination of guilt was upheld, but the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author and the documentary evidence, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Davila v. Selsky, 305 A.D.2d 953, 953, 759 N.Y.S.2d 404 [2003]; Matter of Anderson v. Selsky, 297 A.D.2d 867, 867, 746 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2002] ). Petitioner's assertion that the drugs were not his and could have been thrown into his cell by another inmate presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Powell v. Goord, 293 A.D.2d 846, 846, 741 N.Y.S.2d 581 [2002]; Matter of Brown v. Senkowski, 290 A.D.2d 906, 907, 736 N.Y.S.2d 638 [2002] ). Petitioner's claims that he was denied relevant documentation and that the chain of custody was broken were not raised at the disciplinary hearing and, therefore, are not preserved for our review (see Matter of Christian v. Goord, 20 A.D.3d 862, 863, 798 N.Y.S.2d 807 [2005]; Matter of Torres v. Selsky, 8 A.D.3d 775, 775, 777 N.Y.S.2d 815 [2004] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)