Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Pedro ESTRADA, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Based on confidential information that petitioner was involved in an altercation with a fellow inmate, an investigation ensued. Thereafter, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit assaulting an inmate, fighting and failing to report an injury. At the tier III disciplinary hearing that followed, petitioner pleaded guilty to fighting and failing to report an injury, explaining the incident in detail. Petitioner was found guilty of all three charges, however, on administrative appeal the determination was modified by dismissing the assault charge and reducing the penalty imposed. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
By pleading guilty to fighting and failing to report an injury, petitioner is precluded from challenging the evidentiary basis for the determination of guilt (see Matter of Smith v. Goord, 21 A.D.3d 1152, 800 N.Y.S.2d 789 [2005]; Matter of Lebron v. McGinnis, 20 A.D.3d 793, 797 N.Y.S.2d 923 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 714, 806 N.Y.S.2d 165, 840 N.E.2d 134 [2005] ). Furthermore, having failed to raise his remaining objections at the disciplinary hearing, they are not preserved for our review (see Matter of Lebron v. McGinnis, supra; Matter of Harris v. Selsky, 15 A.D.3d 708, 709, 788 N.Y.S.2d 714 [2005] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)