Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert T. PHELAN, Appellant, v. Linda Schween PHELAN, Respondent.
In an action to partition real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated October 21, 1996, as denied his motion to vacate or modify the referee's report.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The referee properly determined that the plaintiff's outstanding child support obligation was $25 per child per week. A decision of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 10, 1982, made in a prior support and custody proceeding, directed the plaintiff to pay child support in the amount of $25 per child per week. This decision was binding on all courts of coordinate jurisdiction notwithstanding that it was not embodied in a formal order (see, Forbush v. Forbush, 115 A.D.2d 335, 496 N.Y.S.2d 311; Spahn v. Griffith, 101 A.D.2d 1011, 476 N.Y.S.2d 676; Matter of Silverberg v. Dillon, 73 A.D.2d 838, 423 N.Y.S.2d 760). The decision was binding on the parties (see, Atlas Feather Corp. v. Pine Top Ins. Co., 122 A.D.2d 241, 242, 505 N.Y.S.2d 436) and was not altered by subsequent orders in the support and custody proceeding.
Since the parties were to share the net rental income from the former marital residence, the defendant was entitled to an allowance for the expenses she paid toward mortgage interest, principal, and taxes (see, Bailey v. Mormino, 6 A.D.2d 993, 175 N.Y.S.2d 993). In addition, the record does not establish any basis for disturbing the defendant's allowance for repairs (see, Wawrzusin v. Wawrzusin, 212 A.D.2d 779, 623 N.Y.S.2d 255; Worthing v. Cossar, 93 A.D.2d 515, 462 N.Y.S.2d 920) or for the water bill and water softener (cf., Gordon v. Schroeder, 138 Misc. 688, 248 N.Y.S. 279).
Finally, under the circumstances, the defendant was properly credited for her payment of insurance premiums.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 27, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)