Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Daniel K. MONKO, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing for New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of altered items and paraphernalia giving reasonable grounds to believe that escape is planned after a 1 1/212-inch piece of plastic eating utensil with a staple melted into one end was discovered in petitioner's cell. Finding that the determination is supported by substantial evidence, we confirm. Initially, the deficiencies in the hearing transcript do not preclude a meaningful review of the proceedings as they relate to petitioner's arguments (see, Matter of Fletcher v. Selsky, 199 A.D.2d 865, 866, 606 N.Y.S.2d 396, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 753, 612 N.Y.S.2d 108, 634 N.E.2d 604). The record reveals that petitioner admitted to fabricating the item found in his cell for the purpose of opening handcuffs. That admission, along with the detailed misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officer who conducted the search of petitioner's cell and evidence of petitioner's two previous escape attempts, support the findings of guilt (see, Matter of Tavarez v. Goord, 237 A.D.2d 837, 655 N.Y.S.2d 189). In view of the serious nature of the charges, the penalty imposed (36 months in special housing, with a corresponding loss of good behavior time and privileges) was neither harsh nor excessive (see, id.).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)