Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Le Roy MOORE, Appellant, v. David L. MILLER, as Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered February 26, 1997 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Eastern Correctional Facility in Ulster County for his 1985 conviction of the crime of sodomy in the first degree (People v. Moore, 132 A.D.2d 776, 517 N.Y.S.2d 584, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 802, 522 N.Y.S.2d 119, 516 N.E.2d 1233). In September 1996, petitioner commenced this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus contending that the Grand Jury which indicted him refused to call the witnesses he requested, thereby resulting in a jurisdictionally defective accusatory instrument. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm. Habeas corpus relief is inappropriate where, as here, the issue now advanced by petitioner was raised on the direct appeal from his judgment of conviction (id.) and could have been raised in his CPL article 440 motion (see, People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Kuhlmann, 239 A.D.2d 721, 657 N.Y.S.2d 1021, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 808 [Sept. 18, 1997]; People ex rel. Walker v. Senkowski, 205 A.D.2d 813, 615 N.Y.S.2d 292, lv. denied 84 N.Y.2d 808, 621 N.Y.S.2d 517, 645 N.E.2d 1217). Moreover, we find nothing in this case which would warrant our departure from traditional orderly proceedings (see, People ex rel. Flores v. Miller, 201 A.D.2d 820, 821, 609 N.Y.S.2d 865; cf., People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257, 262, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)