Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jonathan GIBSON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from making threats, engaging in violent conduct, possessing prison contraband, engaging in harassment, refusing to obey a direct order, creating a disturbance and participating in a demonstration. Substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner's guilt. Included in the evidence presented against petitioner were three detailed misbehavior reports written by correction officers who were eyewitnesses to the misconduct in question, i.e., petitioner became violent when, in the context of a nonsmoking area of the visitors' room, he was ordered to surrender his cigarettes. Petitioner proceeded to assault the correction officers, both verbally and physically, and it ultimately took five correction officers to subdue him. The testimony given by correction officers who were witnesses to the events in question was consistent with the misbehavior reports. On this record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative determination (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Williams v. Goord, 242 A.D.2d 842, 842-843, 662 N.Y.S.2d 617, 618). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)