Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dorothy DI GUIDA, Petitioner, v. H. Carl McCALL, as New York State Comptroller, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's request for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a food service worker, was injured when she fell on milk crates which were being used as stairs at the door of her assigned work place. The record establishes that the injury occurred at the end of petitioner's shift as she was leaving for the day. In view of this, we find that substantial evidence supports respondent's determination denying petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits on the ground that she was not “in service” at the time she was injured (see, Matter of Nappi v. Regan, 186 A.D.2d 855, 588 N.Y.S.2d 212, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 703, 594 N.Y.S.2d 717, 610 N.E.2d 390). Although petitioner testified that she was injured five minutes before the end of her shift while she was en route to another building to sign out, this testimony presented a credibility issue for respondent to resolve (see, Matter of Martinson v. Regan, 176 A.D.2d 1121, 1121-1122, 575 N.Y.S.2d 219).
Substantial evidence further supports the denial of petitioner's application for ordinary disability retirement benefits. The report by the physician who examined petitioner on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System found no indication that petitioner had suffered either a neck or shoulder injury; the report also concluded that petitioner did not exhibit any significant functional disability which would render her unable to perform her work.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)