Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Keith DUBRAY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
As the result of an incident in which a correction officer observed petitioner throw punches at another inmate, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assault. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Initially, we note that the matter was properly transferred to this Court inasmuch as the petition raises a question of substantial evidence (see Matter of Young v. Selsky, 32 A.D.3d 598, 818 N.Y.S.2d 872 [2006] ). Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers familiar with the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Brown v. Selsky, 49 A.D.3d 1108, 853 N.Y.S.2d 740 [2008]; Matter of Peoples v. Selsky, 33 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 822 N.Y.S.2d 824 [2006] ). The contrary testimony of petitioner and his inmate witnesses presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Ramos v. Selsky, 48 A.D.3d 863, 864, 849 N.Y.S.2d 913 [2008] ). In view of the foregoing, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 23, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)